DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001253876-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-12-07

000010449

Contested design: 001253876-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 001253876-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TrekStor GmbH

Germany (DE)

Berliner Ring 7, 64625 Bensheim, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

ZAGG Incorporatedvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

3855 South 500 West, Suite J, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115, United States of America

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(f)Article 25(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested RCD used drawings and sketches by Ronghua Jia that were later assigned through Speedy Mega and Tosenta to the applicant, so the RCD infringed its German copyright.
  • The holder argued the applicant had not proved the content of German law, ownership of any earlier copyright, or entitlement to invalidate the RCD, and said its employee independently created the design.
  • The Division found the 05/07/2011 assignment agreement post-dated the RCD filing and did not prove an earlier copyright work or earlier right under Article 25(1)(f).
  • It also found no sufficient pre-filing evidence to assess authorship, development, or infringement, while the holder's earlier US priority claims and press release supported independent development.
  • The sole invalidity ground was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.0214.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010451

vs ZAGG Inc

2018-12-07Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(f)148
000010450

vs ZAGG Inc

2018-12-07Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(f)148
000107739

vs Shenzhen Sinobry Electronic Ltd

2020-01-16Invalidity application rejected146
000101619

vs caresyntax GmbH

2019-06-17Invalidity application rejected146
000102939

vs Andres Meseguer Lozano

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejected146
000010861

vs Adam Hall GmbH

2018-09-28Invalidity application rejected146
000129183

vs Yi Duan

2025-09-16145
000124156

vs Autoelektronika Maciej Świdnicki

2024-07-02145