DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002748541-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-01-14

000010668

Contested design: 002748541-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002748541-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MAR-BUD spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Budownictwo spółka komandytowa

Poland (PL)

ul. Pawła Włodkowica 2C, 03-262 Warszawa, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Fast Development.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Kanałowa 35, 40-748 Katowice, Poland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the pipe-with-radiator design was not a proper protectable design, would be invisible in normal use in the intended heat exchanger, and had appearance features dictated entirely by technical function.
  • The holder replied that the product could also be used visibly in spray coolers, radiators, or as an independent exchanger, that the registration sufficiently identified the product, and that the shape reflected non-technical design choices.
  • The Division found Article 8(1) decisive: the only proven use was as an internal industrial heat-exchanger component, the appearance had no demonstrated aesthetic or marketing role, and the holder showed no independent design effort.
  • It declared the RCD invalid under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 8(1), did not examine the Article 3(a) and Article 4(2) grounds further, and ordered the holder to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238