DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004378917-0018

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-01-15

000011224

Contested design: 004378917-0018

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0043789170018 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Saverglassvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Rue de la Gare 3, 60960 Feuquieres, Francia

Represented by

Novagraaf France

Holder · RCD owner

Bruni Glass S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

viale C. Colombo 12/14

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDAllegato 1

bottiglie (modello anteriore Captain Hook)

disegno comunitario n. 003477322-0001 · Bollettino dei disegni comunitari · disclosed 2016-11-22

Web disclosureAllegato 2

estratto del sito web rappresentante il modello anteriore di bottiglia Captain Hook

www.saverglass.fr · www.saverglass.fr

CatalogAllegato 3

scheda prodotto del modello anteriore Captain Hook

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Community design No 003477322-0001 and supporting website and product-sheet evidence.
  • The holder argued the comparison must focus on the registered representations and that differences in the neck, shoulder, handle opening, taper, and base created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the earlier design was sufficiently disclosed through its EUIPO publication and rejected the novelty ground because the differences were not irrelevant.
  • It nevertheless held that the shared bottle shape features dominated the overall impression, the designer's freedom was broad, and the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to reimburse EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098