DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001451447-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-02-21

000010920

Contested design: 001451447-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 350 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

La demande en nullité est accueillie. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 001451447-0001 est déclaré nul. La titulaire supporte les frais exposés par la demanderesse, fixés à 350 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Animall Professional Care Ltdvia PDF extraction

Hungary (HU)

Hársas u. 14., 2112 Veresegyház, Hongrie

Holder · RCD owner

Natural Best Products Labor S.L

Spain (ES)

Post Box 300, 29670 San Pedro Alcantara, Malaga, Espagne

Represented by

Elvire Schoonjans

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

spiral animal collar with protrusions

RCD No 003183177-0001

Web disclosure

image of a spiral animal collar corresponding to the earlier design

www.google.com image search for "herba max" · Google Images

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested animal-collar design lacked novelty because it matched the holder's earlier design No 003183177-0001, had been sold or disclosed years earlier, and was function-driven.
  • The holder replied that the applicant's evidence did not establish lack of novelty or individual character and that the invalidity application should be rejected.
  • The Division accepted the internet screenshots as evidence that the earlier design image was publicly accessible before the contested filing date and compared only the protected features of the earlier design.
  • It found the compared designs identical apart from insignificant colour differences, held the contested RCD not new under Article 5, and therefore declared it invalid without examining the Article 8 ground.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica Norma LEWIS
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

22.0630.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010917

vs Natural Best Products Labor S.L

2019-02-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)30, 2211
000010916

vs Natural Best Products Labor S.L

2019-02-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)30, 2211
000127915

vs SHEN ZHEN MIN DUN SAFE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000130022

vs ChunRun Zhou

2025-11-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000127201

vs CarpFuture

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228