DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015013138-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-27

000127915

Contested design: 015013138-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015013138-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Axon Enterprise, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

Scottsdale, United States

Represented by

Mewburn Ellis Llp

Holder · RCD owner

Shen Zhen Min Dun Safe Technology Development Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Ballester IP

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Double Shots Smart Electronic Control Device TX200P electronic stun gun shown in the Husha 2020 catalogue

https://web.archive.org/web/20211206031615/http://hushatr.com/ENG_HUSHATR-Brochure-20200521-V1.0.pdf · Internet Archive Wayback Machine / HUSHATR brochure · disclosed 2022-02-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on the earlier TX200P stun-gun design disclosed in the Husha catalogue and an archived web brochure.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, argued the specialised circles were limited to law-enforcement procurement actors, and said functional and regulatory constraints left little design freedom.
  • The Division found the catalogue and Wayback evidence objectively proved public disclosure before 1 March 2023 and that the holder had not rebutted accessibility to specialised circles.
  • Taking a not severely limited degree of design freedom into account, the Division found the designs created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

22.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130022

vs ChunRun Zhou

2025-11-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000127201

vs CarpFuture

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000124998

vs EVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL S.R.L.

2024-08-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000119298

vs SNIPERMECHANICS LTD

2023-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000118041

vs Weihai hunthouse fishing tackle Co,.Ltd

2022-09-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000117459

vs SHUIHUA LIU

2022-06-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000116029

vs Linyi Jiezhong Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

2022-03-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000116146

vs Luoshan county qimingxinghui electric appliance sales co. LTD

2022-01-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228