DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005503331-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-08

000116029

Contested design: 005503331-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0055033310001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Maximilian Altmannvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Schwabmühlhauser Str 15, 86853 Langerringen, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Linyi Jiezhong Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

L245, Commodity display centre, Linyi shopping mall, Lanshan Dist., Shandong province., Linyi, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. s.r.l.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Outdoor Recurve Bow and Arrow Set – Archery Training Toy – 40 lbs, 5 x Arrows, 6 x Target Faces

ASIN B 077 R5N X6J · German Amazon website (amazon.de) · disclosed 2017-07-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested bow design lacked novelty and individual character because very similar bows had been marketed before the filing date.
  • The holder said the cited bow derived from its own development, relied on a Chinese design patent evaluation report and authorisation letter, and effectively invoked the grace period.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de listing as prior disclosure and found the holder had not proved a link showing the disclosure should be disregarded under the grace period exception.
  • Comparing the designs from the informed user's perspective, the Division found the same overall impression and declared the contested design invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

22.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127915

vs SHEN ZHEN MIN DUN SAFE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000130022

vs ChunRun Zhou

2025-11-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000127201

vs CarpFuture

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000124998

vs EVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL S.R.L.

2024-08-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000119298

vs SNIPERMECHANICS LTD

2023-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000118041

vs Weihai hunthouse fishing tackle Co,.Ltd

2022-09-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000117459

vs SHUIHUA LIU

2022-06-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000116146

vs Luoshan county qimingxinghui electric appliance sales co. LTD

2022-01-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228