DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008636526-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-20

000118041

Contested design: 008636526-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the order states that the applicant must bear the holder’s costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008636526-0001 is declared invalid. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

FIIISH (Société A Responsabilité Limitée)via PDF extraction

France (FR)

410 rue Robert Schuman, 29490 Guipavas, France

Represented by

Ipside

Holder · RCD owner

Weihai hunthouse fishing tackle Co,.Ltd

China (CN)

305, youth entrepreneurship Incubation Park, Shandong University (Weihai), HIDZ, Weihai, Shandong Province 264200, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

fishing lures

RCD No 001879404-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2011-06-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity based on its earlier RCD, arguing lack of individual character and also alleging bad faith and lack of novelty.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest the application.
  • The Division treated bad faith as inadmissible, accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, and found the lure designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design invalidated; the costs section is internally inconsistent between the order and the reasons.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

22.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127915

vs SHEN ZHEN MIN DUN SAFE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000130022

vs ChunRun Zhou

2025-11-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000127201

vs CarpFuture

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000124998

vs EVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL S.R.L.

2024-08-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000119298

vs SNIPERMECHANICS LTD

2023-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000117459

vs SHUIHUA LIU

2022-06-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000116029

vs Linyi Jiezhong Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

2022-03-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000116146

vs Luoshan county qimingxinghui electric appliance sales co. LTD

2022-01-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228