DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015058726-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-14

000127201

Contested design: 015058726-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered EU design No 015058726-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015058726-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RidgeMonkey Group Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Liverpool, United Kingdom

Represented by

Cathy Brocklebank

Holder · RCD owner

CarpFuture

Belgium (BE)

Evergem, Belgium

Represented by

De Clercq & Partners

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1

RidgeMonkey Advanced Boilie Crusher

004019743-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-06-12

Registered RCDD2

RidgeMonkey Advanced Boilie Crusher

004019743-0002 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-06-12

Web disclosure

YouTube video showing the RidgeMonkey Advanced Boilie Crusher

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjlmkDA4-20 · YouTube · disclosed 2016-09-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier EU designs 004019743-0001 and 004019743-0002, also citing a 16 September 2016 YouTube disclosure.
  • Holder argued the differences in lid transparency, colour, handle placement, proportions and detailing, plus limited design freedom from technical constraints, produced a different overall impression.
  • The Division found both earlier EU designs were disclosed before the filing date, the designer’s freedom was at least average, and the contested design created the same overall impression as D1.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR; Article 5 and the remaining earlier disclosures were not examined further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

22.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127915

vs SHEN ZHEN MIN DUN SAFE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000130022

vs ChunRun Zhou

2025-11-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000124998

vs EVOLUTION INTERNATIONAL S.R.L.

2024-08-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000119298

vs SNIPERMECHANICS LTD

2023-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000118041

vs Weihai hunthouse fishing tackle Co,.Ltd

2022-09-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000117459

vs SHUIHUA LIU

2022-06-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000116029

vs Linyi Jiezhong Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

2022-03-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228
000116146

vs Luoshan county qimingxinghui electric appliance sales co. LTD

2022-01-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)228