DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005511573-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-29

000103559

Contested design: 005511573-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005511573-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

BES Yapi Limited

Türkiye (TR)

Çarşı Mah. Kıyı Sk. No: 2/A Yakacık Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey

Represented by

J A KEMP

Holder · RCD owner

Midbrass Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Midbrass Building, Mill Road, Sharnbrook, Bedford, MK44 1NP, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Micropoint Gas Cooker Hose - EN14800

http://midbrass.co.uk · Internet Archive / midbrass.co.uk · disclosed 2015-09-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested hose connector design lacked novelty and individual character because the same micropoint gas hose had been publicly sold, shown online, and tested before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive page, corroborated by invoices and a test report, as solid evidence of public disclosure by 6 September 2015.
  • The Division found novelty was not destroyed by immaterial-detail identity, but the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier hose design and lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238