DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003380799-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-04-10

000102419

Contested design: 003380799-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003380799-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

DP Danmark A/S

Denmark (DK)

Mosevej 9, P.O. Box 149, Næstved, 4700 Denmark

Represented by

Rasmus Stub

Holder · RCD owner

Peter Dueholm

Denmark (DK)

Tjørnevej 55, 4684 Holmegaard, Denmark

Represented by

CHAS. HUDE A/S

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogExhibit 3

bag design shown in the 'dp danmark' 2013 sales catalogue

dp danmark

CatalogExhibit 4

bag designs shown in the 'dp danmark' 2015 sales catalogue

dp danmark

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on bag designs disclosed in its 2013 and 2015 catalogues.
  • The holder argued the applicant, as licensee, could not attack the design and said the contested paper bag differed in handle, windows, side pieces and materials.
  • The Division held any person may file this invalidity action, found the 2013 catalogue design was publicly disclosed before filing, and rejected the novelty claim because the differences were not immaterial.
  • Because the similarities outweighed the minor differences for an informed user and designer freedom was high, the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.0532.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000011054

vs Voltino

2019-04-26REUD invalidated32, 099
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098