DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015111662-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-10

000130925

Contested design: 015111662-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and registered EU design No 015111662-0001 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015111662-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Christian Schäfervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Neu-Isenburg, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Deyu Capital S.r.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Criscior, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

'plantvibes wedding guest book' — book cover ornamentation with stylised handwritten 'Gästebuch' script

https://www.amazon.de, ASIN B0CJ38FXHY · amazon.de · disclosed 2023-09-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (Christian Schäfer) argued that the contested design for book-cover ornamentation (stylised 'Gästebuch' lettering) lacks individual character in view of an identical product (ASIN B0CJ38FXHY) offered on Amazon.de since 23/09/2023, well before the filing date of 23/07/2025; colour differences are immaterial.
  • Holder argued it had itself disclosed an earlier version on Amazon.de on 19/09/2023 (ASIN B0CJ35Y6DB) as an unregistered EU design predating the applicant's product, and submitted Keepa.com data showing the applicant's product was listed only from February 2024.
  • The Division held that the holder's arguments regarding its own earlier unregistered design and the applicant's alleged copying were irrelevant to the invalidity assessment; the applicant's prior design (ASIN B0CJ38FXHY) was available to the public on 23/09/2023, predating the contested design's filing date; the verbal element's stylisation and overall appearance are identical, with only a colour difference insufficient to endow individual character.
  • Application upheld; contested design declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328