DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008657357-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-15

000126078

Contested design: 008657357-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, Community design No. 008657357-0003 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008657357-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Association GYIvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

78, allée Primavera Centre Ubidoca 20837, 74370 Annecy, Frankreich

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

Stada Arzneimittel AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stadastr. 2-18, 61118 Bad Vilbel, Deutschland

Represented by

Harmsen Utescher

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

older packaging-carton ornament shown on archived Aliud Pharma web pages

https://web.archive.org/web/20160116234910/http://www.aliud.de/arzneimittel/rezeptfreie-arzneimittel/agnus-castus-al/; https://web.archive.org/web/20160506115414im_/https://fachwelt.aliud.de/umbraco/api/resource/getpublicimage?id=15128 · Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2016-01-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on an earlier design disclosure identified as D1.
  • It submitted Wayback Machine screenshots from 2016 showing the earlier design on Aliud Pharma web pages before the contested filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division found D1 validly disclosed under Article 7(1) and considered the contested design identical or differing only in immaterial details.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124719

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328