DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001354252-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-01-21

000124696

Contested design: 001354252-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the registered Community design No 001354252-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001354252-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Association GYIvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

78, allée Primavera Centre Ubidoca 20837, 74370 Annecy, Frankreich

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

In der Mark 2, 56332 Loef, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

SOG logo shown on archived website screenshots

http://www.sog-dahmann.de via web.archive.org · Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2006-04-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on archived screenshots of the same SOG logo shown on the holder's website before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the request was insufficiently substantiated, the screenshots did not clearly identify the earlier design, and the earlier logo was not identical to the contested design.
  • The Division held the web evidence sufficiently identified the earlier logo and proved disclosure through the Internet Archive before the contested design's filing date.
  • Comparing only the protected features of the contested design, the Division found only immaterial tonal differences and concluded the contested design lacked novelty.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124719

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328