DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002839639-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-05-29

000010703

Contested design: 002839639-0004

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No 002839639-0004 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 002839639-0004 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Massimo Belloni

Italy (IT)

Via Abate d'Adda 77, 20043 Arcore (Mi), Italien

Holder · RCD owner

Jelenia Plast sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Spoldzielcza 47, 58 500 Jelenia Gora, Polen

Prior art cited (4)

OtherD1

older storage-container design compared against the contested design

OtherD2

older storage-container design compared against the contested design

OtherD3

older storage-container design compared against the contested design

OtherD4

older storage-container design compared against the contested design

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier DragonBox and DodoFlat storage-container designs, and also alleged unauthorized use of a work protected by Italian copyright.
  • The holder denied that the cited earlier designs produced the same overall impression and disputed that the applicant had established any enforceable copyright in the claimed work.
  • The Division accepted only part of the applicant's disclosure evidence and found the compared earlier designs had smoother walls and materially different surface structure from the contested design's wave pattern, so novelty and individual character were not defeated.
  • The copyright ground also failed because the applicant did not substantiate the content and application of the invoked Italian law sufficiently.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000108801

vs BERLIN PACKAGING FRANCE

2020-10-23Invalidity application rejected076
000105464

vs SNV Creations Inc.

2019-12-23Invalidity application rejected076
000000002

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejected076
000000001

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejected076
000000003

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejected076
000010924

vs Novelis Deutschland GmbH

2019-06-28Invalidity application rejected076
000101841

vs Richard Andrews

2019-06-25Invalidity application rejected076
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejected076