DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003331941-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-06-06

000105299

Contested design: 003331941-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0033319410001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

‘Mistral alko’via PDF extraction

RU

Preobrazhenskiy val, house 1, stroenie 1, Moscow 107061, Russian Federation

Represented by

‘UAB MSP Europe’

Juozas Lapienis

Holder · RCD owner

Stepan Pinciuc

MD

Ginta Latina 17/1, Chisinau, the Republic of Moldova

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

bottle holder and bottle

Community design No 0030938300001 · Office bulletin · disclosed 2016-06-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier Community design No 0030938300001, stressing the same hourglass bottle, holder structure, and bottle decoration.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the applicant's comparison and legal grounds undefended.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was disclosed by its prior publication and that the shared bottle shape, decoration, and holder construction outweighed the base-shape difference.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098