DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002705236-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-15

000011237

Contested design: 002705236-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0027052360001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Karla Colletto Swimwear Inc

United States (US)

319-D Mill St. NE, Vienna, Virginia 22180, United States of America

Represented by

BIRD & BIRD LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

United States (US)

255 Hudson Street, Apartment 4a, New York, New York 10013, United States of America

Represented by

Withers Worldwide

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Yves Saint Laurent Ruffled Off-The-Shoulder Bikini swimwear design

www.neimanmarcus.com-vintage.com / fullclutch.com · Internet Archive Wayback Machine and fullclutch.com · disclosed 2012-01-09

Web disclosureD2⚠ rejected as evidence

Carolina Herrera spring 2014 runway-show bikini design

www.nydailynews.com · NY Daily News website · disclosed 2013-09-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over two earlier off-the-shoulder bikini designs disclosed online before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder disputed that either prior design had been validly disclosed in time and argued that the compared swimwear designs created different overall impressions.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 based on the Wayback Machine and corroborating website evidence, but rejected D2 because the screenshot and late schedule evidence did not reliably prove disclosure.
  • Comparing the contested design only with D1, the Division found visible differences in the top edge, briefs shape, connecting band and seams, so the RCD retained individual character.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGaile SAKALAITÉ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000009181

vs Crocs, Inc.

2019-07-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028