DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005822301-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-11-29

000105199

Contested design: 005822301-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 0058223010001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MAC Mode GmbH & Co. KGaA

Germany (DE)

Industriestr. 2, 93192 Wald/Roßbach, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Reinhold Fleckenstein Jeanswear GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Maybachstr. 2, 72202 Nagold, Deutschland

Prior art cited (4)

Prior useD1⚠ rejected as evidence

MAC Daydream trousers

Anlagen A1.1.1-A1.1.4 und A1.2

Prior useD2⚠ rejected as evidence

TONI DRESS trousers

Anlagen 2.1-2.4

Prior useD3⚠ rejected as evidence

Victoria trousers

Anlagen 3.1-3.4

Prior useD4⚠ rejected as evidence

Gerry Weber trousers

Anlagen 5-8

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier trouser models D1 to D3 and later also D4.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character and repeated that position after the applicant's reply.
  • The Division found D1 to D3 were not proven disclosed before filing because the evidence consisted mainly of undated photos and an affidavit lacking independent corroboration.
  • D4 and its supporting evidence were filed only in reply, changed the dispute's subject matter, and were therefore not taken into account.
  • The invalidity application was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000106199

vs CALZATURIFICIO MERLYN SHOES SRLS

2020-02-18Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000009181

vs Crocs, Inc.

2019-07-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028