DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006268025-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-02-18

000106199

Contested design: 006268025-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0062680250001 è respinta. 2. Il richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Alberto Ciaschinivia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sardegna 21, 60019 Senigallia, Italia

Represented by

Giovanni Leone

Holder · RCD owner

Calzaturificio Merlyn Shoes Srlsvia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Corso Trieste 130, 81100 Caserta, Italia

Represented by

Nicola Giaccio

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDAllegato 2

heel for footwear

RCD No 002718460-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-06-23

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

applicant's web pages showing various women's shoes with cigarette-shaped heels

applicant's web pages

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on an earlier RCD for a shoe heel and alleging the contested design copied a cigarette-shaped heel shown before filing.
  • Holder denied the factual narrative, argued the designs were materially different in form, decoration, and attachment to the shoe, and requested total rejection of the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, refused to consider late undated additional web-image evidence, and found the applicant's bad-faith argument inadmissible because it is not an Article 25(1) invalidity ground.
  • On the merits, the Division found the shared cylindrical heel shape was standard, while the contested design's cigarette details, colors, wording, and upper connection created a different overall impression, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000104179

vs Alanui S.r.l.

2020-01-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000105199

vs Angels GmbH

2019-11-29Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011208

vs VAPESOL-FÁBRICA DE COMPONENTES PARA CALÇADO, UNIPESSOAL, LDA

2019-08-14Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011237

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011239

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011238

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000011236

vs Lisa Marie Fernandez, LLC

2019-07-15Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028
000009181

vs Crocs, Inc.

2019-07-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)028