DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004663508-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-02

000105319

Contested design: 004663508-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004663508-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Tubino Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No.3210, Block A, Metropolis Building, Shenhui Road, Buji Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Yajuan Li

China (CN)

F3, Bldg. A2, Haocheng Ind. Park, Fuyuan 1st Rd., Fuyong St., BaoAn Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

IntellectPol IP Law Firm Sławomir Krysztof Nowicki

Sławomir Krysztof Nowicki

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Drawstring Makeup Bag (cosmetic bag) by ONEGenug

ASIN B0777GH47H · Amazon.co.uk and Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-11-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested storage-bag design lacked novelty because an identical drawstring cosmetic bag had been publicly offered on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Amazon.co.uk and Amazon.de printouts for ONEGenug's Drawstring Makeup Bag under ASIN B0777GH47H dated November 2017.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's disclosure evidence or substantive novelty challenge.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listings as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 and found the only differences were immaterial text elements.
  • Because the prior design made the contested RCD identical within Article 5, the application was upheld and the RCD declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098