DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000953492-0019

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-14

000102401

Contested design: 000953492-0019

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No. 000953492-0019 is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000953492-0019 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

NBL Europe GmbH

Germany (DE)

Monzastr. 4a, 63225 Langen, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Erwin Müller GmbH

Germany (DE)

Breslauer Str. 34-38, 49808 Lingen (Ems), Deutschland

Prior art cited (4)

Catalog

toilet roll holder from applicant's 2006 bathroom accessories catalog

Article No. 11343A · applicant product catalog · disclosed 2006-12-31

National design

ZL 200730117710.3 · China

Registered RCD

000640636-0009

Registered RCD

000640636-0010

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior disclosures of its Series 113 toilet roll holder and cited Chinese and Community designs.
  • The holder argued the evidence did not prove prior disclosure, challenged the dating and reliability of the catalog and affidavits, and asked for the application to be rejected.
  • The Division found the 2006 catalog extracts corroborated the affidavits and proved public disclosure before the filing date under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing the cited earlier design with the contested RCD, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238