DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000953492-0021

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-14

000102420

Contested design: 000953492-0021

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested Community design is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000953492-0021 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

NBL Europe GmbH

Germany (DE)

Monzastr. 4a, 63225 Langen, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Erwin Müller GmbH

Germany (DE)

Breslauer Str. 34-38, 49808 Lingen (Ems), Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAnlage 8

wall-mounted bathroom shelf from the applicant's 'Serie 113'

Artikelnr. 11351A · NBL product catalog 2006 · disclosed 2006-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior disclosure of its bathroom accessory 'Serie 113', including shelf article 11351A shown in its 2006 catalog.
  • The holder argued the evidence did not prove disclosure because the catalog lacked a print date, the witness statements came from interested employees, and exhibition or distribution at trade fairs was unproven; it also disputed similarity.
  • The Division found the catalog extracts consistent with the 2006 cover and sufficiently corroborated by the sworn statements, so the earlier shelf design was disclosed to the public by the end of 2006 under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing the wall-mounted bathroom shelves, the Division found very similar shape, proportions, surface treatment, and mounting supports, creating the same overall impression on the informed user; the contested design therefore lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238