DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005328234-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-13

000105280

Contested design: 005328234-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005328234-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Eyad Aboabdovia PDF extraction

United States (US)

1038 E. Bastanchury Rd. #154, Fullerton, California 92835, United States of America

Represented by

BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP

Holder · RCD owner

HD Packaging Group Company Limited

China (CN)

2507A, Lerthai Center, Zhongshan East Road, Chang’an District, Shijiazhuang City, Heibei Province 050000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

BERGGREN OY

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

dispensers, bottles, caps

RCD No 003556216-0005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-03-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier RCD No 003556216-0005 for dispensers, bottles and caps.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted publication of the earlier RCD in the Community Designs Bulletin as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Given broad designer freedom, the minor cap and bottle-bottom differences did not alter the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098