DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005887213-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-13

000106202

Contested design: 005887213-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005887213-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Société Bicvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

14, rue Jeanne d’Asnières, 92110 Clichy, France

Represented by

Desbarres & Staeffen

Holder · RCD owner

Ningbo Epene Moulded Manufacturing Company, Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Building N.6, N.26 Beihai Road, Beilun, Ningbo 315800, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

PatentAnnex 2

writing pen

Chinese design patent No 201 330 454 639.3 · China · disclosed 2014-02-26

CatalogAnnex 6

catalogue distributed at the 2017 Frankfurt Paperworld fair showing the same pen

Paperworld catalogue · Frankfurt Paperworld fair · disclosed 2017-01-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Chinese design patent and a 2017 Paperworld catalogue disclosure of the same pen.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity allegations undefended.
  • The Division found the Chinese design patent publication and the trade-fair catalogue sufficiently proved prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR before the contested filing date.
  • It found no material differences between the pens, held the designs identical, and declared the contested RCD invalid for lack of novelty.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198