DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004068989-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-12-04

000107619

Contested design: 004068989-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004068989-0006 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Steffen Kämper

Germany (DE)

Neuenkirchener Str. 35, 33334 Gütersloh, Germany

Represented by

Kämper & Maiwald

Holder · RCD owner

Hancheng Wei

China (CN)

No 27, Baishi Xincuo, Huadong Village, Daba Town, Puning City, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnexes 1 and 2

Keynice Mini USB Clip and Desk Personal Fan

ASIN B01A6X7B4S · Amazon.co.uk and YouTube · disclosed 2016-01-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested fan lacked novelty and individual character because the same Keynice clip-and-desk fan had been disclosed online before filing.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and did not contest disclosure or the design comparison.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon and YouTube evidence as solid proof of prior disclosure and found only minor colour and viewpoint differences between the designs.
  • Given broad designer freedom for fans, those minor differences did not alter the overall impression, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138