DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002701359-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-03-09

000105239

Contested design: 002701359-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002701359-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

André Walentavia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Chiemgaustraße 136, 81549 Mänchen, Germany

Represented by

Nadine Friese

Holder · RCD owner

Baltag Raduvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str.Fagetului, Nr.20-C, Oradea, Romania

Represented by

Intelect SRL

Prior art cited (2)

PublicationEnclosure 6

mouthguard

JADA, Vol. 132, July 2001 · Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)

Web disclosure

mouthguards already known and used in sports

Wikipedia article · Wikipedia

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier mouthguard disclosures including a JADA article and a Wikipedia article.
  • The holder disputed the reliability of Wikipedia, argued the design had individual character, and denied that the shape was solely dictated by technical function.
  • The Division accepted the JADA journal publication as sufficient prior disclosure and found the informed user would perceive only minor differences between the designs.
  • Given the designer's limited freedom for mouthguards, those minor differences did not create a different overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6 CDR, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FLTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248