DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006383345-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-08

000109021

Contested design: 006383345-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006383345-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ontel Products Corporationvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

21 Law Drive, Fairfield, New Jersey 07004, United States of America

Represented by

Silex IP

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Haoqi Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Rm. 77026, 7F, Gaoke Group Bldg., No. 2076, Yueliangwan Ave., Nanshan St., Nanshan Dist., Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

air conditioner

RCD No 005969029-0001 · Office eSearch database / Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-01-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested air-conditioner design lacked novelty and individual character because it reproduced an earlier RCD disclosed before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of earlier RCD No 005969029-0001 through the Office database and bulletin publication before the contested filing date.
  • Despite minor differences, the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user given the designer's broad freedom.
  • The application was upheld and the contested RCD was invalidated for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238