DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005948007-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-21

000105559

Contested design: 005948007-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0059480070001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

HRT vGmbHvia PDF extraction

LU

50 Rue de Muehlenbach, 2168, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Holder · RCD owner

Baltag Radu Impresa Individualevia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

A. Pulega 3, 40133 Bologna, Italy

Represented by

INTELECT SRL

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

occlusal splints (mouthguards) offered on Amazon

ASIN B07K1G4NXB · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2018-10-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier mouthguard design disclosed on Amazon.de from 29 October 2018.
  • Holder argued Amazon was not reliable evidence, claimed the disclosure fell within the grace period, and maintained the contested design had individual character.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon extract and reviews as reliable evidence of public disclosure by a third party, so the grace period did not apply.
  • Comparing the disclosed features only, the Division found no clearly perceivable differences and held the contested RCD lacked novelty under Article 5 CDR.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FLTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248