DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006644274-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-25

000109681

Contested design: 006644274-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0066442740001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0066442740001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Leonahrd Steckervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Rosswachtstr. 50 Halle 3 – Rueckseite, 85221 Dachau, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Qiang Linvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

14G Haojingmingyuan, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Karel Mul

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

still from a YouTube review video showing a cylindrical battery

YouTube · disclosed 2017-04-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that the contested design was a standard 18650 battery long available on the market.
  • The applicant relied on a screenshot from YouTube dated 25 April 2017 showing the earlier battery design; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube material as prior disclosure under Article 7 and found the compared batteries identical, with only immaterial faint markings.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 350 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138