DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006477600-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-19

000107801

Contested design: 006477600-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006477600-0002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Aquamix, S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Belani Nr.85, Jud. Covasna, Belani, Romania

Represented by

S.C. Fantana Raul Sorin & Asoc. S.R.L.

Raul Sorin Fântână

Holder · RCD owner

Comix system Termelő, Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft.

Hungary (HU)

Nagymágocs, Szántó Kovács János u. 4., 6622, Hungary

Represented by

Adelina Stanciu

Prior art cited (1)

National design

siphon-heads

Hungarian design registration No D1300020-0001 · DesignView database · disclosed 2014-04-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested siphon-head design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Hungarian design No D1300020-0001 and also used its prior Romanian trade mark.
  • The holder said design freedom was limited by function, denied prior disclosure, and maintained the contested design's characteristic elements created novelty and a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the Hungarian design through the DesignView extract and assessed individual character on that basis.
  • It found the shared overall shape and key features dominated, while colour, branding, and added decorative details did not change the informed user's overall impression.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4 and 6 CDR, so the RCD was declared invalid and the holder bore costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238