DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006477600-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-19

000107802

Contested design: 006477600-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006477600-0003 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Aquamix, S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Belani Nr.85, Jud. Covasna, Belani, Romania

Represented by

S.C. Fantana Raul Sorin & Asoc. S.R.L.

Raul Sorin Fântână

Holder · RCD owner

Comix system Termelő, Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft.

Hungary (HU)

Nagymágocs, Szántó Kovács János u. 4., 6622, Hungary

Represented by

Adelina Stanciu

Prior art cited (2)

National design

siphon heads

Hungarian design No D1300020-0001 · DesignView database · disclosed 2014-04-28

Trade mark

applicant's registered Romanian trade mark

Romanian trade mark No 107353 · Romanian trade mark database

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over Hungarian design D1300020-0001 and also invoked its Romanian trade mark as a prior distinctive sign.
  • Holder argued designer freedom was limited, the contested siphon head had distinctive modernised features and a different overall impression, and the trade mark attack was abusive and technically driven.
  • The Division treated the DesignView extract as solid proof that the Hungarian design had been disclosed before the RCD filing date.
  • It found the shared overall shape and main features dominated, while the yellow extension, branding, colour, material and minor body-shape differences did not change the informed user's overall impression.
  • The application succeeded under Article 25(1)(b) with Articles 4 and 6 CDR, so the RCD was invalidated and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238