DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005253416-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-06-25

000104879

Contested design: 005253416-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0052534160001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jerzy Pietrucha BUSINESS ASSETSvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Przemysłowa 10, 98-235 Błaszki, Poland

Represented by

Bartłomiej Emil Fijałkowski

Holder · RCD owner

Robert Kaleski

Poland (PL)

Bukowa 6 95-100 Zgierz, Poland

Represented by

EUPATENT.PL

Adam Pawłowski

Prior art cited (2)

Patent⚠ rejected as evidence

Polish patent application for 'Road drain and manner of its assembly in the road structure'

P.422495 · Polish Patent Office · disclosed 2019-02-11

Catalog⚠ rejected as evidence

Pietrucha company catalogue showing road drains / vinyl road drainage

Pietrucha

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR for lack of novelty and individual character based on a design shown in a Polish patent application and a company catalogue.
  • The holder argued the contested RCD met the novelty and individual-character requirements and that disclosure of the alleged earlier design had not been proven.
  • The Division found suspension unnecessary because the invalidity claim failed anyway, and it held the patent materials lacked a publication date while the catalogue was undated and did not clearly identify the relied-on design.
  • Because none of the evidence proved prior public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR, the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000118299

vs Robert Kaleski

2023-05-15Art 25(1)(b)237
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)235
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)235
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)235
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)235
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)235
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)235
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)235