DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004375525-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-23

000108481

Contested design: 004375525-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0043755250009 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sladak Med EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

18, 'Sv. Kiril i Metodii' Str., Office 9, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria

Represented by

Ivanka Pakidanska

Holder · RCD owner

Олинеза Премиум ООДvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

ул. 'София' 9, 2230 Костинброд, Bulgaria

Represented by

Kostadin Manev

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

jar

http//:www.sks-bottle.com (Internet Archive capture) · Internet Archive / sks-bottle.com · disclosed 2015-03-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the jar lacked individual character because square glass jars with round threaded necks were already disclosed, including a jar shown on the SKS Bottle website archived on 31/03/2015.
  • The holder argued the prior designs created different overall impressions, were insufficiently disclosed, and that market saturation and functional constraints made even small differences significant.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the prior jar adequately represented for comparison.
  • The Division found the designer retained enough freedom in the jar's overall shape and that the contested design produced the same overall impression as the prior jar, so it lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098