DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005943602-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-08

000108043

Contested design: 005943602-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0059436020002 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0059436020002 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Sonoff Technologies Co.,Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

1001, No. 8 Lianhua industrial park, Longhua longyuan avenue, Hualian community, Longhua street, Longhua district, Shenzhen city, People's Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Huanmi Industrial Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm.401, No. 9, 8 Lane Xinsan Community, Buji St., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen 518000, People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Diymore 90V-250V AC WiFi Smart Switch Wireless Remote Controller

ASIN B01J2T5FHC · www.amazon.com · disclosed 2016-07-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over several earlier designs, including a Diymore smart switch disclosed on Amazon.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as solid evidence of disclosure before the RCD filing date and compared the earlier switch design with the contested RCD.
  • It found the designs produced the same overall impression and that the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b).
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138