DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005622008-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-18

000108025

Contested design: 005622008-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 005622008-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Işik Tarim Ürünleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketivia PDF extraction

Türkiye (TR)

75. Yil Cumhuriyet Mahallesi Ova Sokak No:9 Ören, Kemalpasa Izmir 35733, Turkey

Represented by

Silex IP

Holder · RCD owner

Sda Gida Tarim Üretim Ithalat Ihracat Sanayi Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketivia PDF extraction

Türkiye (TR)

Organize Sanayi Bölgesi 1299. Cad. No: 5, Turgutlu / Manisa, Turkey

Represented by

Carlos Hernández Hernández

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

cheese packaging / food container with peel-off lid

http://www.sek.com.tr; Internet Archive capture 2017-09-23 · Internet Archive / sek.com.tr · disclosed 2017-09-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on a Turkish producer website preserved by the Internet Archive before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the earlier disclosure would not reasonably become known to specialised EU circles and that differences in depth, edges and lid tab created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the archived website sufficiently proved prior disclosure and held the holder had not shown that the Turkish market disclosure could not reasonably become known in the EU.
  • Given broad designer freedom and the close similarity in overall shape, lid contour and tab, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098