DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006618054-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-22

000110321

Contested design: 006618054-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid in full, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006618054-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhenshi Hongling Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 1908B, Building 12, Site 2 of Huating, No. 6, Yinwei Road, Longgang Street, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Yanbao Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Room 401, Mingjie Building, No. 52 Minsheng Avenue, Gongming St., Guangming New Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Itechnik HX6064 Black Brush Heads with Hygienic Travel Cap

https://www.amazon.de (ASIN B06XN5GXSQ) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-03-08

Web disclosure

Qleboa 16 Toothbrush Attachment

https://www.amazon.de (ASIN B07DRJQWRQ) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-06-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested toothbrush-head protective cap lacked novelty because identical caps had been sold on Amazon.de since 2017 and 2018.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de evidence as prior public disclosure under Article 7(1) and used the 2017 Hygienic Travel Cap disclosure for the comparison.
  • It found no differences beyond immaterial details, held the designs identical under Article 5(2), and declared the RCD invalid for lack of novelty.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098