Invalidity · first instance · 2020-09-29
000110987
Contested design: 005830155-0002
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 005830155-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Huang Xinyanvia PDF extraction
China (CN)
No. 62 Guanghua Group, Liuyuan Village, Qiligang Township, Linchuan District, Fuzhou City, Jiangxi Province, People’s Republic of China
Represented by
Dimitris Morides
Holder · RCD owner
Cao Yangvia PDF extraction
China (CN)
No.19, Group 1, Huodi Village, Jiangkou Town, Yunyang County, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
Prior art cited (1)
Fruitman Gadgets Ballpoint Pen
ASIN B077XBPRM1 · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2017-12-17
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying at least on the earlier Fruitman Gadgets Ballpoint Pen disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
- ›The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application or the evidence of prior disclosure.
- ›The Division accepted the Amazon extract and customer reviews as solid evidence that D1 was publicly disclosed before the contested RCD filing date.
- ›It found the additional ruler prevented identity under Article 5, but not a different overall impression under Article 6, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.
Deciding panel
- MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
- MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
- MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131384 vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000131626 vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000130967 vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd. | 2026-02-12 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000127580 vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ | 2025-10-22 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000129366 vs FHU Jarosław Wolski | 2025-10-16 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000129423 vs AFFARGO LTD | 2025-10-14 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000128919 vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd | 2025-07-31 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000126063 vs STADA Arzneimittel AG | 2024-10-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |