DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005636065-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-10-15

000110388

Contested design: 005636065-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0056360650001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0056360650001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen A-unit Electronics Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

4th Floor, Building 8, Zhiheng, Strategic Emerging Industrial Park, Nankou Pass 2nd Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518000 People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Holder · RCD owner

Rong Hua LIU

China (CN)

101B, 102B Building C6, Hengfeng Industrial Park, Hezhou, Xixiang, Bao’an district, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

CABINET ROMAN ANDRE

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

adapter

CN304473231S · Chinese design registration / design patent certificate · disclosed 2018-01-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested adapter design lacked novelty and individual character over several earlier designs, in particular Chinese design registration D1.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure of D1 or the asserted lack of individual character.
  • The Division accepted the Chinese design certificate as proof that D1 was published before the contested filing date and found broad design freedom for the adapter’s overall shape.
  • It held that the shared casing shape and port arrangement dominated the comparison, so the contested RCD created the same overall impression as D1 and lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138