DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006509188-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-10-22

000110501

Contested design: 006509188-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006509188-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hairui HUvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.9 Hengxiang Road, Wufu Industrial Zone, Yiting Town, Shangyu District Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Junyang Gaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Section 5, Zhanjia Village, Maozhu Town, Qiyang County, Hunan Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

box sold on Amazon.de under the name 'WIMI Explosion Box Mit Zubehor Scrapbook DIY Foto Album fur Geburtstag Jahrestag Valentine Hochzeit Geschenk'

ASIN B07QWC46NG · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-12-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over several earlier designs, including an Amazon.de disclosure of an explosion box.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and did not contest the applicant's evidence or the alleged prior disclosure.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de extract and customer-review evidence as solid proof that D1 was publicly disclosed before the contested RCD's filing date.
  • Comparing the designs without added decorations, the Division found the same rectangular box, lid, and corner openings, so the contested RCD lacked novelty and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098