DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002196394-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-10-27

000110762

Contested design: 002196394-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité est accueillie. 2. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 002196394-0009 est déclaré nul. 3. La titulaire support les frais exposés par la demanderesse, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Elektro-Plast Tadeusz Czachorowski sp. jvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Płońska 18, 05-190 Nasielsk, Pologne

Represented by

Ewa Grenda

Holder · RCD owner

Lohuis Romania Impex srlvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

B-dul Iuliu Maniu nr. 528, etaj 1, sector 6, 061129 Bucarest, Roumanie

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAnnexe 1

single electrical socket

Catalogue Elektro-Plast Nasielsk 2007, index 0324-01 · Elektro-Plast Nasielsk catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Elektro-Plast socket disclosed in its 2007 catalogue and supported by invoices from 2004, 2010, and 2011.
  • The holder appointed a representative but filed no observations within the time limit, later requesting a new deadline and information about the ongoing invalidity proceedings.
  • The Division found the earlier socket had been publicly disclosed before 5 March 2013 through the 2007 catalogue and commercial invoices, so Article 7 disclosure was proven.
  • Although novelty failed because some details differed, the common protected features created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138