DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006137006-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-02

000110061

Contested design: 006137006-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0061370060001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yuyao Elet Appliance Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No 58, North Guangming Road, Simen Town, Yuyao, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Greenway Electronic Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

The 1,2,3 Floor of 90th Building, The Second Industry Park of Lisonglang Community, Gongming Street, Guangming New District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

waterproof connectors

RCD No 0030432490005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-05-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier RCD for waterproof connectors, also alleging EU sales of the same product before the contested priority date.
  • The holder argued the designs were not identical, the identified differences were material, the contested design created a different overall impression, and some end-nut features were technically functional.
  • The Division accepted publication of the earlier RCD in the Community Designs Bulletin as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) and did not need to assess the additional sales evidence.
  • Comparing the registered appearances, the Division found several body-shape, proportion, symmetry, and detail differences that gave the contested RCD a different overall impression and also defeated the novelty attack.
  • The invalidity application was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to reimburse the holder's representation costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124975

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-08-01Art 25(1)(b)137
000124937

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-07-14Art 25(1)(b)137
000126960

vs Qiu Chen

2025-05-21Art 25(1)(b)137
000122734

vs Changjiang Xutangrui Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-06-05Art 25(1)(b)137
000122617

vs Shanghai Cuiliang E-commerce Co., Ltd

2024-02-19Art 25(1)(b)137
000121023

vs Piotr Malinowski

2023-07-21Art 25(1)(b)137
000117379

vs WATT AND SEA

2022-12-13Art 25(1)(b)137
000116129

vs WD Plus GmbH

2022-08-30Art 25(1)(b)137