DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015068899-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-05-21

000126960

Contested design: 015068899-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015068899-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Ruikale Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Holder · RCD owner

Qiu Chen

China (CN)

Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Yanyun Zhang

Prior art cited (5)

Web disclosureD1

Solar Charger, 20 W Foldable Solar Charger, Portable Solar Panel with USB

ASIN B0BQ6T86BT · amazon.sa · disclosed 2022-12-15

Web disclosureD2

Pompa per Fontana Ad Energia Solare

ASIN B0D9KR6T4Y · amazon.it · disclosed 2024-07-16

Web disclosureD3

SPYMINNPOO Water Pump with 4W 5V Solar Panel

ASIN B0DBGN7KDB · amazon.de · disclosed 2024-07-28

Web disclosureD4

Solar Water Pump, Portable 3W 5 V Solar Fountain

ASIN B09Z9YJKMF · amazon.com · disclosed 2022-05-17

Web disclosureD5

Solar Water Pump 120L/H 3W 5V Solar Fountain

ASIN B0BDYB3MSK · amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2022-09-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Articles 25(1)(b), 5 and 6 EUDR, relying on five Amazon product listings disclosed before the contested design's filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application or the applicant's later supplemental printouts.
  • The Division admitted the supplemental internet evidence and found all five prior designs had been validly disclosed before 7 August 2024.
  • Comparing overall impressions, the Division found material differences in proportions, cell number, cell layout and solar-cell shape, so the contested design had individual character and was not identical to any prior design.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's representation costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124975

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-08-01Art 25(1)(b)137
000124937

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-07-14Art 25(1)(b)137
000122734

vs Changjiang Xutangrui Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-06-05Art 25(1)(b)137
000122617

vs Shanghai Cuiliang E-commerce Co., Ltd

2024-02-19Art 25(1)(b)137
000121023

vs Piotr Malinowski

2023-07-21Art 25(1)(b)137
000117379

vs WATT AND SEA

2022-12-13Art 25(1)(b)137
000116129

vs WD Plus GmbH

2022-08-30Art 25(1)(b)137
000111943

vs Shenzhen Cuco Smart Technology Co., Ltd

2021-01-22Art 25(1)(b)137