DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004701191-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-01-22

000111943

Contested design: 004701191-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 004701191-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

FIBAR GROUP S.A.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Serdeczna 3, 62-081 Wysogotowo, Poland

Represented by

Michał Jackowski

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Cuco Smart Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

2F, No. 14, Difu Road, Gushu, Xixiang Town, Bao an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

IntellectPol IP Law Firm

Sławomir Krzysztof Nowicki

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

intelligent electrical socket

RCD No 003764851-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-02-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over its earlier RCD No 003764851-0001 for an intelligent electrical socket.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD but found the designer's freedom not substantially limited and gave less weight to common technical socket features.
  • Differences in shape, proportions, and especially the colorful appearance produced a different overall impression, so the contested RCD retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberClaudia SCHLIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124975

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-08-01Art 25(1)(b)137
000124937

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-07-14Art 25(1)(b)137
000126960

vs Qiu Chen

2025-05-21Art 25(1)(b)137
000122734

vs Changjiang Xutangrui Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-06-05Art 25(1)(b)137
000122617

vs Shanghai Cuiliang E-commerce Co., Ltd

2024-02-19Art 25(1)(b)137
000121023

vs Piotr Malinowski

2023-07-21Art 25(1)(b)137
000117379

vs WATT AND SEA

2022-12-13Art 25(1)(b)137
000116129

vs WD Plus GmbH

2022-08-30Art 25(1)(b)137