DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008773139-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-21

000121023

Contested design: 008773139-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ACTIVESHOP sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Agnieszka Byra

Holder · RCD owner

Mollylac Michał Szewczyk, Piotr Malinowski Spółka Cywilnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Piotrkowska 270, 90-361 Łódź, Poland

Represented by

Maria Przybylska-Karczemska

Legal grounds invoked

Article 28(1)(b)(vi)Article 52(2)Article 30(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity of Community design No 008773139-0001 under Article 25(1)(b) based on Articles 4(1), 5(1)(b) and 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • Holder did not need to respond on the merits because the Office first examined whether the application contained a reasoned statement with supporting facts, evidence and arguments.
  • The Division found the application lacked the required reasoned statement and that the applicant failed to remedy the deficiency after being invited to do so within the set time limit.
  • The application was rejected as inadmissible and the invalidity fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124975

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-08-01Art 25(1)(b)137
000124937

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-07-14Art 25(1)(b)137
000126960

vs Qiu Chen

2025-05-21Art 25(1)(b)137
000122734

vs Changjiang Xutangrui Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-06-05Art 25(1)(b)137
000122617

vs Shanghai Cuiliang E-commerce Co., Ltd

2024-02-19Art 25(1)(b)137
000117379

vs WATT AND SEA

2022-12-13Art 25(1)(b)137
000116129

vs WD Plus GmbH

2022-08-30Art 25(1)(b)137
000111943

vs Shenzhen Cuco Smart Technology Co., Ltd

2021-01-22Art 25(1)(b)137