DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005657897-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-11

000105480

Contested design: 005657897-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 005657897-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KPB Healthcare Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

RSS, M3 Trade Park, Manor Way, Leigh Road, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO50 9YA, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

FBGC Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Styring House Farm, Nr Givendale, York, York YO42 1TL, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

ear wax removal kit / ear syringe with blue safety tip

EAR WAX REMOVAL KIT JB7113 / ASIN B00LNGIZWA · amazon.co.uk; ebay.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, focusing on the blue tip shown in the contested ear-syringe design.
  • The holder argued the design had individual character because of its blue shade, logo, registration views, and allegedly limited designer freedom from technical constraints.
  • The Division accepted prior web disclosure of the JB7113 ear wax removal kit and excluded only one inconsistent photo from the comparison.
  • It found the logo, scale graphics, and any colour difference insignificant, so the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design.
  • The application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 350 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELISOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248