DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005845104-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-14

000110141

Contested design: 005845104-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holders' costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0058451040002 is rejected. The applicant bears the holders’ costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hongping Tanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 09, Renmin West Road 41, Kaiyun Town, Hengshan County, Hunan Province, Hengshan, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Nan Li

Holder · RCD owner

Creek Dannyvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Vale Science & Technology, Friedrichstr. 123, 10117 Berlin, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

USB cable offered on Amazon.de

ASIN B07CJ847YY · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-05-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier USB cable sold on Amazon.de under ASIN B07CJ847YY from 13/05/2018.
  • The holders argued the products differed in appearance, materials, colours, performance, technology and structure, and that the prior design did not include a USB connector.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon disclosure date but found the evidence showed only part of the earlier cable, preventing a full overall-impression comparison with the contested RCD.
  • Because essential features of the prior design were not sufficiently shown, neither lack of individual character nor lack of novelty was established, so the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129364

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-05-05Art 25(1)(b)135
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)135
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)135
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)135
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)135
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)135
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)135
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)135