DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000992078-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-16

000108261

Contested design: 000992078-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 000992078-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Green Label Manufacturing Europe Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Flat/RM 1406 14F Loon Key Building, 267-275 Des Voeux Road, Central Hongkong, Sonderverwaltungszone Hongkong der Volksrepublik China

Holder · RCD owner

Miele & Cie. KG

Germany (DE)

Schutzrechte/Verträge, Carl-Miele-Str. 29, 33332 Gütersloh, Deutschland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 4(3)Article 3(c)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 4(2), arguing the vacuum cleaner bag is a component of a complex product that is not visible in normal use.
  • The holder argued vacuum cleaner bags are consumables rather than components, are replaced without dismantling the vacuum cleaner, and therefore the Article 4(2) restrictions do not apply.
  • The Division held that a vacuum cleaner bag is a component of the complex product of a vacuum cleaner and that replacing it involves disassembly and reassembly within the meaning of the Regulation.
  • The Division found the bag is not visible during the vacuum cleaner's intended use because opening the cleaner and changing the bag is maintenance, not normal use.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098