DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004120202-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-01-27

000110781

Contested design: 004120202-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 004120202-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lafat komerc d.o.o.via PDF extraction

BA

Industrijska zona bb, Kalesija 57260, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Holder · RCD owner

SC Biodome Europe Srlvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Florilor 4, sc. A, ap 20, Sighisoara, Judetul Mures, Sighisoara, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Publication

combustion container for pellets in the Alfa Plam Grande pellet boiler

"Pellet Boiler Grande: Instruction for Use, Maintenance and Installation", Version 1.1/May 2014 · Alfa Plam instruction manual and related YouTube product review videos · disclosed 2014-05-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the combustion container was not visible during normal use and lacked novelty and individual character over Alfa Plam's earlier pellet-boiler disclosure.
  • The holder argued the component was visible through a transparent cover, the manual and videos did not prove public disclosure, and the contested design had differentiating features and technical constraints.
  • The Division found the visible features satisfied Article 4(2) CDR and that the manual, hyperlink, and YouTube screenshots together proved pre-filing disclosure of the prior design.
  • The compared designs created the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor differences, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238