DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007714548-0023

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-29

000113802

Contested design: 007714548-0023

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0077145480023 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Saverglass SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

3, Rue de la Gare, 60960, Feuquieres, France

Represented by

Novagraff France

Holder · RCD owner

Spotlight Oral Care Limited

Ireland (IE)

Block 2 Harris House Small IDA Business Park Tuam Road, Galway, Ireland

Represented by

Tomkins & Co.

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

bottle

RCD No 0017837470001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2010-11-23

CatalogD2

MIKI bottle

SAVERGLASS catalogue "SPIRITUEUX SPIRIT COLLECTION", page 43 · SAVERGLASS catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier bottle design registered at EUIPO and shown in its SAVERGLASS catalogue.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been validly disclosed and that the catalogue images confirmed essentially the same prior bottle design for comparison purposes.
  • It held that the bottle shape dominated the informed user’s overall impression, while the graphics and stopper had little weight, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098