DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002763607-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-31

000111301

Contested design: 002763607-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0027636070001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fibar Group S.A.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Serdeczna 3, 62081 Wysogotowo, Poland

Represented by

Michał Jackowski

Holder · RCD owner

Gang Wang

China (CN)

The two phase of A 2 unit 10 room 02, Jia Zhaoye Center, Huizhou Road No. 11, District of Huicheng, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Alberto Maria Giordano

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

intelligent electrical socket

Community design No 0021576440002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-05-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier Community design No 0021576440002 and also invoked lack of novelty and unauthorised copyright use.
  • The holder argued the compared designs differed materially and that technical and safety constraints significantly limited the designer’s freedom for smart sockets.
  • The Division found disclosure of the earlier design proven, considered designer freedom not substantially limited, and held the shared cylindrical form, ring edge, and button placement dominated the overall impression.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the invalidity application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay fixed costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138