DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001453625-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-07

000110670

Contested design: 001453625-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community Design No 001453625-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 001453625-0001. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jaime Daniel Steelsvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Junta de los Caminos, 47, 29190 Málaga, España

Represented by

Alicia Álvarez Gorris

Holder · RCD owner

Naxani Design, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Avda. de la Libertad, 38, 46600 Alzira (Valencia), España

Represented by

Sandra Santos Rodríguez

Prior art cited (2)

Catalog

Naxani BOXY bathroom furniture design shown in the holder's product catalog and public price list.

Naxani product catalog and public price list

Catalog

Archeda Bathroom model GOLA COMP 21 shown in the Archeda Bathroom catalog.

Archeda Bathroom catalog (Italy)

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing that the contested BOXY bathroom furniture design had been disclosed before filing and outside the grace period.
  • The holder disputed the evidential value of the undated catalog and other materials, and argued that visible differences created a different overall impression for the informed user.
  • The Division accepted the February 2015 Naxani price list and linked catalog as valid evidence showing prior disclosure of the BOXY design before the July 22, 2016 filing date.
  • Comparing the overall impressions, the Division found the differences minor and held that the contested design lacked individual character, so the application was upheld and the RCD invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberÁlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0406.0723.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)06, 2311
000114741

vs CERAMICA CIELO S.p.A.

2022-06-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)06, 2311
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068